- Open Access
Regional clinical practice patterns in reproductive endocrinology: A collaborative transnational pilot survey of in vitro fertilization programs in the Middle East
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Assisted Reproduction volume 4, Article number: 3 (2007)
This research describes current clinical and demographic features sampled from reproductive endocrinology programs currently offering in vitro fertilization (IVF) in the Middle East.
Clinic leadership provided data via questionnaire on patient demographics, demand for IVF services, annual cycle volume, indications for IVF, number of embryos transferred, twinning frequency, local regulations governing range of available adjunct therapies, time interval between initial enrollment and beginning IVF as well as information about other aspects of IVF at each center.
Data were received from representative IVF clinics (n = 13) in Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Mean (± SD) age of respondents was 47.8 ± 8 yrs, with average tenure at their facility of 11.2 ± 6 yrs. Estimated total number of IVF programs in each nation responding ranged from 1 to 91. All respondents reported individual participation in accredited CME activity within 24 months. 76.9% performed embryo transfers personally; blastocyst transfer was available at 84.6% of centers. PGD was offered at all sites. In this population, male factor infertility accounted for most IVF consultations and the majority (59.1%) of female IVF patients were < 35 yrs of age. Prevalence of smoking among female IVF patients was 7.2%. Average number of embryos transferred was 2.4 (± 0.4) for patients at age < 35 yrs, and 2.9 (± 0.8) at age > 41 yrs. For these age categories, twinning (any type) was observed in 22.6 (± 10.8)% and 13.7 (± 10.4)%, respectively. In 2005, the average number of IVF cycles completed at study sites was 1194 (range 363–3500) and 1266 (range 263–4000) in 2006. Frozen embryo transfers accounted for 17.2% of cycles at these centers in 2005. Average interval between initial enrollment and IVF cycle start was 8 weeks (range 0.3–3.5 months).
This sampling of diverse IVF clinics in the Middle East, believed to be the first of its kind, identified several common factors. Government registry or oversight of clinical IVF practice was limited or nonexistent in most countries, yet number of embryos transferred was nevertheless fairly uniform. Sophisticated reproductive health services in this region are associated with minimal delay (often < 8 weeks) from initial presentation to IVF cycle start. Most Middle East nations do not maintain a comprehensive IVF database, and there is no independent agency to collect transnational data on IVF clinics. Our pilot study demonstrates that IVF programs in the Middle East could contribute voluntarily to collaborative network efforts to share clinical data, improve quality of care, and increase patient access to reproductive services in the region.
Panek RC, Deloney LA, Park J, Goodwin W, Klein W, Ferris EJ: Interdepartmental problem-solving as a method for teaching and learning systems-based practice. Acad Radiol. 2006, 13: 1150-4. 10.1016/j.acra.2006.06.003.
Wofford JL, Singh S: Exploring the educational value of clinical vignettes from the Society of General Internal Medicine national meeting in the internal medicine clerkship: a pilot study. J Gen Intern Med. 2006, 21: 1195-7. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00596.x.
Hebert RS, Wright SM: Re-examining the value of medical grand rounds. Acad Med. 2003, 78: 1248-52. 10.1097/00001888-200312000-00013.
Testart J, Plachot M, Mandelbaum J, Salat-Baroux J, Frydman R, Cohen J: World collaborative report on IVF-ET and GIFT: 1989 results. Hum Reprod. 1989, 7: 362-9.
Howles CM, Loumaye E, Giroud D, Luyet G: Multiple follicular development and ovarian steroidogenesis following subcutaneous administration of a highly purified urinary FSH preparation in pituitary desensitized women undergoing IVF: a multicentre European phase III study. Hum Reprod. 1994, 9: 424-30.
Platteau P, Smitz J, Albano C, Sorenson P, Arce JC, Devroey P: Exogenous luteinizing hormone activity may influence the treatment outcome in in vitro fertilization but not in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2004, 81: 1401-4. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.077.
Imhorn MC: Making Muslim babies: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni vs. Shi'a Islam. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2006, 30: 427-50. 10.1007/s11013-006-9027-x.
Birenbaum-Carmeli D: Cheaper than a newcomer: on the social production of IVF policy in Israel. Sociol Health Illn. 2004, 26: 897-924. 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00422.x.
Reynolds MA, Schieve LA, Jeng G, Peterson HB: Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology?. Fertil Steril. 2003, 80: 16-23. 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00572-7.
Pratt KT: Inconceivable? Deducting the costs of fertility treatment. Cornell Law Rev. 2004, 89: 1121-200.
Collins J: An international survey of the health economics of IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod Update. 2002, 8: 265-77. 10.1093/humupd/8.3.265.
Serour GI, Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT: Bioethics in medically assisted conception in the Muslim world. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995, 12: 559-65. 10.1007/BF02212574.
Fadel HE: The Islamic viewpoint on new assisted reproductive technologies. Fordham Urban Law J. 2002, 30: 147-57.
Inhorn MC: Religion and reproductive technologies. IVF and gamete donation in the Muslim world. Anthropol News. 2005, 1-4.
Sinclair DB: Assisted reproduction in Jewish law. Fordham Urban Law J. 2002, 30: 71-106.
Schenker JG: Assisted reproductive practice: religious perspectives. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005, 10: 310-9.
Simoes E, Bauer S, Schmahl FW: Registries as a method to promote quality improvement–an investigation based on the example of assisted reproduction. Gesundheitswesen. 2003, 65: 516-25. 10.1055/s-2003-42390.
The authors are grateful to the clinical and support staffs from the centers participating in this study. Additionally, we appreciate the coordinating input from Consular officials and U.S. Embassy medical office personnel who helped facilitate this research.
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
ESS, HSQ, ZB, AVTD, AR, SC, IAJ, GS, ME, MAK, AD, KT, PO, AMF, BAL and AE provided data and editorial comment; all authors read and approved the final manuscript. BAL provided statistical oversight. ESS and AE conceptualized the project, coordinated drafts and organized the research.
About this article
Cite this article
Sills, E.S., Qublan, H.S., Blumenfeld, Z. et al. Regional clinical practice patterns in reproductive endocrinology: A collaborative transnational pilot survey of in vitro fertilization programs in the Middle East . J Exp Clin Assist Reprod 4, 3 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-1050-4-3