Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human)

Abstract

Background

Laboratory animals are commonly used for evaluating the physiological properties of the mammalian ovarian follicle and the enclosed oocyte. The use of different species to determine the morphological relationship between the follicle and oocyte has led to a recognizable pattern of follicular stages, but differences in follicle size, oocyte diameter and granulosa cell proliferation are not consistent across the different species. In an effort to better understand how these differences are expressed across multiple species, this investigation evaluates oocyte and follicle diameters and granulosa cell proliferation in the mouse, hamster, pig, and human.

Methods

Histological sections of ovaries from the mouse, hamster, pig, and human were used to calculate the diameter of the oocyte and follicle and the number of granulosa cells present at pre-determined stages of follicular development. A statistical analysis of these data was performed to determine the relationship of follicular growth and development within and between the species tested.

Results

These data have revealed that the relationships of the features listed are tightly regulated within each species, but they vary between the species studied.

Conclusion

This information may be useful for comparative studies conducted in different animal models and the human.

References

  1. Gougeon A: Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: facts and hypotheses. Endocr Rev. 1996, 17 (2): 121-155. 10.1210/er.17.2.121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fortune JE: Ovarian follicular growth and development in mammals. Biol Reprod. 1994, 50 (2): 225-232. 10.1095/biolreprod50.2.225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirshfield AN: Development of follicles in the mammalian ovary. Int Rev Cytol. 1991, 124: 43-101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peters H: The development of the mouse ovary from birth to maturity. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1969, 62 (1): 98-116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pedersen T, Peters H: Proposal for a classification of oocytes and follicles in the mouse ovary. J Reprod Fertil. 1968, 17 (3): 555-557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wassarman PM: Oogenesis. Reproductive Endocrinology, Surgery, and Technology. Edited by: Adashi EY, Rock JA, Rosenwaks Z. 1996, Philadelphia , Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 342-357.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gougeon A: Dynamics of human follicular growth: Morphologic, dynamic, ad funcitonal aspects. The Ovary. 2004, Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knigge KM, Leathem JH: Growth and atresia of follicles in the ovary of the hamster. Anat Rec. 1956, 124 (4): 679-707. 10.1002/ar.1091240406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wassarman PM, Josefowicz WJ: Oocyte development in the mouse: an ultrastructural comparison of oocytes isolated at various stages of growth and meiotic competence. J Morphol. 1978, 156 (2): 209-235. 10.1002/jmor.1051560206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fricke PM, Ford JJ, Reynolds LP, Redmer DA: Growth and cellular proliferation of antral follicles throughout the follicular phase of the estrous cycle in Meishan gilts. Biol Reprod. 1996, 54 (4): 879-887. 10.1095/biolreprod54.4.879.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gougeon A: Dynamics of follicular growth in the human: a model from preliminary results. Hum Reprod. 1986, 1 (2): 81-87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van den Hurk R, Zhao J: Formation of mammalian oocytes and their growth, differentiation and maturation within ovarian follicles. Theriogenology. 2005, 63 (6): 1717-1751. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Delforge JP, Thomas K, Roux F, Carneiro de Siqueira J, Ferin J: Time relationships between granulosa cells growth and luteinization, and plasma luteinizing hormone discharge in human. 1. A morphometric analysis. Fertil Steril. 1972, 23 (1): 1-11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans AC: Characteristics of ovarian follicle development in domestic animals. Reprod Domest Anim. 2003, 38 (4): 240-246. 10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00439.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gougeon A: Ovarian follicular growth in humans: ovarian ageing and population of growing follicles. Maturitas. 1998, 30 (2): 137-142. 10.1016/S0378-5122(98)00069-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hunter MG, Wiesak T: Evidence for and implications of follicular heterogeneity in pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1990, 40: 163-177.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mermillod P, Oussaid B, Cognie Y: Aspects of follicular and oocyte maturation that affect the developmental potential of embryos. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1999, 54: 449-460.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Trounson A, Anderiesz C, Jones G: Maturation of human oocytes in vitro and their developmental competence. Reproduction. 2001, 121 (1): 51-75. 10.1530/rep.0.1210051.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eppig JJ, O'Brien MJ: Development in vitro of mouse oocytes from primordial follicles. Biol Reprod. 1996, 54 (1): 197-207. 10.1095/biolreprod54.1.197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hunter MG: Oocyte maturation and ovum quality in pigs. Rev Reprod. 2000, 5 (2): 122-130. 10.1530/ror.0.0050122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gougeon A, Chainy GB: Morphometric studies of small follicles in ovaries of women at different ages. J Reprod Fertil. 1987, 81 (2): 433-442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoage TR, Cameron IL: Folliculogenesis in the ovary of the mature mouse: a radioautographic study. Anat Rec. 1976, 184 (4): 699-709. 10.1002/ar.1091840409.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Morbeck DE, Esbenshade KL, Flowers WL, Britt JH: Kinetics of follicle growth in the prepubertal gilt. Biol Reprod. 1992, 47 (3): 485-491. 10.1095/biolreprod47.3.485.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas T Carrell.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JG performed the data collection and summarization. BRE aided in study design data collection, summarization and statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. IH contributed by performing statistical analysis. CMP and DTC conceived of the study and directed the research design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Jeanine Griffin, Benjamin R Emery contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffin, J., Emery, B.R., Huang, I. et al. Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig, and human) . J Exp Clin Assist Reprod 3, 2 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-1050-3-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-1050-3-2